<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>parliament &#8211; Amphora Media</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.amphora.media/tag/parliament/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.amphora.media</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 11:56:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Which of Malta’s Election Polls Was Most Accurate?</title>
		<link>https://www.amphora.media/2026/06/malta-election-polls-most-accurate-pl-pn-gap</link>
					<comments>https://www.amphora.media/2026/06/malta-election-polls-most-accurate-pl-pn-gap#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daiva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2026 11:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2026 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.amphora.media/?p=2325</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Of the three final pre-election surveys, Malta Today's came closest to calling the split between the two main parties and the gap between them, but it leaned too heavily on third parties and badly missed the turnout.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Of the three final pre-election surveys, Malta Today&#8217;s came closest to calling the split between the two main parties and the gap between them, but it leaned too heavily on third parties and badly missed the turnout.</p>



<p>The election brought the ruling Labour Party (PL) <a href="https://www.amphora.media/2026/05/pl-wins-general-election">its fourth victory</a>, with nearly 52% of the vote. Third parties and independents collected <a href="https://www.amphora.media/2026/06/malta-third-party-general-election-2026">just over 3.5% among them</a>.</p>



<p>Malta Today’s survey underestimated the PL’s performance by over 1 percentage point and was remarkably precise in estimating the performance of the opposition Nationalist Party (PN), with a difference of less than half a percentage point. However, it predicted over 5% would go to third parties and a lower turnout than in 2022. <a href="https://www.amphora.media/2026/05/the-numbers-behind-maltas-election-turnout-87-4-in-2026">This did not happen</a>. Earlier surveys by Malta Today predicted an even larger share for third parties.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="800" height="600" src="https://www.amphora.media/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2026/06/2-800x600.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-2326" srcset="https://www.amphora.media/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2026/06/2-800x600.jpg 800w, https://www.amphora.media/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2026/06/2-600x450.jpg 600w, https://www.amphora.media/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2026/06/2-400x300.jpg 400w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" /></figure>



<p>The Times of Malta overestimated the PL&#8217;s share of the vote by 1.7 percentage points and underestimated the PN’s by a similar margin. It does not look like much, but, taken together, the Times of Malta’s survey had the least accurate estimate of the gap between the two parties. The Times of Malta predicted a much larger gap in the PL’s favour, at 33,600 voters. The gap estimated in the April survey was much closer to the actual election outcome.</p>



<p>This survey was extremely precise in the estimate of third-party vote, placing it at 3.6%. Earlier surveys predicted a similar result.</p>



<p>The Times of Malta also made a very accurate prediction of the turnout, which was slightly overestimated. The turnout predicted in The Times of Malta’s 17th of June survey was 87.9% – very close to the actual figure of 87.4%.</p>



<p>The latest survey by Vincent Marmara also severely overestimated the gap between the two main parties, projecting it at 30,000. Accordingly, it overestimated the PL’s performance and underestimated the PN’s performance by under 2 percentage points to each side.&nbsp;</p>



<p>It was precise (within half a percentage point) in estimating the share that third parties and independents would get. Across four surveys he conducted since February, the gap was consistent and much larger than it ultimately turned out to be. Turnout predictions in surveys earlier in May were similar to Malta Today’s and much lower than the actual turnout.</p>



<p>All in all, it appears that Malta Today’s survey was the most precise in capturing preferences between the two establishment parties, but overestimated the protest vote (third-party vote and non-voting). The Times of Malta and Vincent Marmara’s surveys predicted a much more favourable outcome for the PL than what materialised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.amphora.media/2026/06/malta-election-polls-most-accurate-pl-pn-gap/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>PL Wins General Election</title>
		<link>https://www.amphora.media/2026/05/pl-wins-general-election</link>
					<comments>https://www.amphora.media/2026/05/pl-wins-general-election#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daiva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 09:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2026 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.amphora.media/?p=2314</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Samples collected at the counting hall indicate that the Labour Party (PL) has secured a victory in the general election. The gap is projected to be between 18,000 and 19,000. This was conceded by the Nationalist Party (PN). The turnout was higher than in 2022.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Samples collected at the counting hall indicate that the Labour Party (PL) has secured a victory in the general election.</p>



<p>The gap is projected to be between 18,000 and 19,000. This was conceded by the Nationalist Party (PN).</p>



<p>The turnout was <a href="https://www.amphora.media/2026/05/the-numbers-behind-maltas-election-turnout-87-4-in-2026" data-type="link" data-id="https://www.amphora.media/2026/05/the-numbers-behind-maltas-election-turnout-87-4-in-2026">higher than in 2022</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.amphora.media/2026/05/pl-wins-general-election/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Numbers Behind Malta’s Election Turnout: 87.4% In 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.amphora.media/2026/05/the-numbers-behind-maltas-election-turnout-87-4-in-2026</link>
					<comments>https://www.amphora.media/2026/05/the-numbers-behind-maltas-election-turnout-87-4-in-2026#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daiva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 07:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2026 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.amphora.media/?p=2310</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Maltese voters turn out in numbers that most democracies can only envy. In a country where voting is entirely voluntary, turnout has long ranked among the highest in the world. In 2026, total voter turnout reached 87.42%, up by 1.8% from 2022. Across the 2003, 2008, 2013, and 2017 general elections, the figure drifted downward [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>Maltese voters turn out in numbers that most democracies can only envy. In a country where voting is entirely voluntary, turnout has long ranked among the highest in the world.</p>



<p>In 2026, total voter turnout reached 87.42%, up by 1.8% from 2022.</p>



<p>Across the 2003, 2008, 2013, and 2017 general elections, the figure drifted downward yet never once fell below 92%. Then came 2022, when turnout slipped by roughly 7 points from the previous election to 85.6%.</p>



<p>The electorate itself has been steadily expanding. Between 2003 and 2022, the roll of registered voters grew by 19.2%, climbing from 297,930 to 355,075. By 2026, the number of eligible voters reached 356,832, a net gain of 1,767.</p>



<p>This year, the highest turnout was in the 7th district, and the lowest was in the 12th.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td><strong>Year</strong></td><td><strong>Registered voters</strong></td><td><strong>Votes cast</strong></td><td><strong>Turnout</strong></td><td><strong>Change</strong></td></tr><tr><td>2003</td><td>297,930</td><td>285,122</td><td>95.70%</td><td>—</td></tr><tr><td>2008</td><td>315,357</td><td>294,214</td><td>93.30%</td><td>-2.4%</td></tr><tr><td>2013</td><td>333,072</td><td>309,600</td><td>93.00%</td><td>-0.3%</td></tr><tr><td>2017</td><td>341,856</td><td>314,696</td><td>92.10%</td><td>-0.9%</td></tr><tr><td>2022</td><td>355,075</td><td>304,050</td><td>85.60%</td><td>-6.5%</td></tr><tr><td>2026</td><td>356,832</td><td>311,949</td><td>87.42%</td><td>+1.8%</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<p>These are the results by district:</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table class="has-fixed-layout"><tbody><tr><td><strong>District</strong></td><td><strong>2026</strong></td><td><strong>2022</strong></td><td><strong>2003</strong></td></tr><tr><td>District 12</td><td>81.39%</td><td>80.0</td><td>94.9</td></tr><tr><td>District 10</td><td>82.58%</td><td>80.9</td><td>95.3</td></tr><tr><td>District 9</td><td>85.47%</td><td>83.7</td><td>95.4</td></tr><tr><td>District 11</td><td>87.58%</td><td>85.6</td><td>95.5</td></tr><tr><td>District 1</td><td>87.43%</td><td>85.9</td><td>95.5</td></tr><tr><td>District 8</td><td>88.25%</td><td>86.0</td><td>96.0</td></tr><tr><td>District 3</td><td>88.31%</td><td>86.4</td><td>96.1</td></tr><tr><td>District 4</td><td>88.69%</td><td>86.9</td><td>95.9</td></tr><tr><td>District 2</td><td>88.87%</td><td>87.1</td><td>95.7</td></tr><tr><td>District 5</td><td>89.48%&nbsp;</td><td>87.4</td><td>96.0</td></tr><tr><td>District 6</td><td>88.89%</td><td>87.5</td><td>95.9</td></tr><tr><td>District 7</td><td>89.73%</td><td>87.6</td><td>96.9</td></tr><tr><td>District 13</td><td>89.43%</td><td>88.0</td><td>95.0</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.amphora.media/2026/05/the-numbers-behind-maltas-election-turnout-87-4-in-2026/feed</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Object Caching 116/109 objects using Redis
Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Content Delivery Network Full Site Delivery via cloudflare
Lazy Loading (feed)

Served from: www.amphora.media @ 2026-07-07 11:18:55 by W3 Total Cache
-->